SpringCharts EMR


SpringCharts EMR Logo

 

9 Bewertungen (2,5/5)
 

SpringChart EMR is an on-premise ONC-ACB and ICSA certified solution designed for small to midsize practices. It is suited for allergy and immunology, anesthesiology, cardiology, dermatology, neurology and ophthalmology practices. The solution includes an e-prescription tool provided by Integrated First Databank (FDB). It can be integrated with labs including Quest and LabCorp and can import lab images into the system via a data management tool.

Patients can interact with their physicians through a mobile app that can be used to request prescription renewals and make payments online. SpringChart EMR also features messaging, billing, reports, charts and customizable templates. The practice management module allows healthcare professionals to manage their practice including patient registration, scheduling, claims, billing and reports. Users can apply patient payments, insurance payments and financial entries directly below their corresponding procedures. They can view copay amount, applied deductible, patient balance and patient remainder balance from the same screen. Support is provided via phone.

 

SpringCharts EMR - Patient chart
 
  • SpringCharts EMR - Patient chart
    Patient chart
  • SpringCharts EMR - Office visit
    Office visit
  • SpringCharts EMR - Practice view
    Practice view
Unterstützte Betriebssysteme:
Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP, Mac OS, Windows 2000, Window 8, Windows 10

9 Bewertungen über SpringCharts EMR

 

Rosemary G. Anzahl der Mitarbeiter:  1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter Mitarbeiteranzahl:  1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter

5.10.2017

5.10.2017

Quelle der Bewertung

EMR SYSTEM

Übersetzen auf: Deutsch
Bedienkomfort

 

Funktionalität

 

Produktqualität

 

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

 

Kundenbetreuung

 

Bedienkomfort
Bedienkomfort
Funktionalität
Funktionalität
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wert
Kundenbetreuung

Vorteile

THIS IS A PRETTY EASY AND SIMPLE SYSTEM. ALLOWING TO POINT OUT AND DRAW A MAP OF THE ANATOMY ON CHARTS.

Martin S. Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen Anzahl der Mitarbeiter:  11-50 Mitarbeiter Mitarbeiteranzahl:  11-50 Mitarbeiter

19.9.2017

19.9.2017

Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

Support ten years ago was good, went downhill for a long time but is excellent now.

Übersetzen auf: Deutsch
Bedienkomfort

 

Funktionalität

 

Produktqualität

 

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

 

Kundenbetreuung

 

Bedienkomfort
Bedienkomfort
Funktionalität
Funktionalität
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wert
Kundenbetreuung

Much better than paper.

Vorteile

Great support now. It is server based so that you can keep records during retirement. The cost is low especially when compared to other applications. Our office has looked at quite a few other applications and for the cost and time spent customizing it we keep using it.

Nachteile

Patient portal experience (don't use it anymore) Built for a mac, the finder is poor for attaching documents.

Erika M. Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen Anzahl der Mitarbeiter:  11-50 Mitarbeiter Mitarbeiteranzahl:  11-50 Mitarbeiter

9.1.2018

9.1.2018

Quelle der Bewertung

Easy EHR for busy clinics

Übersetzen auf: Deutsch
Bedienkomfort

 

Funktionalität

 

Produktqualität

 

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

 

Kundenbetreuung

 

Bedienkomfort
Bedienkomfort
Funktionalität
Funktionalität
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wert
Kundenbetreuung

Quick and easy software to operate on for small clinics.

Vorteile

This software is very user friendly to all ages. The ease of moving through the chart quickly is a great feature as well.

Nachteile

The system tends to freeze a lot once an update took place. Customer service was very difficult to get in touch with and sometimes would not call you back until two business days.

Augustin B.

2.12.2013

2.12.2013

Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

SpringCHarts by Spring Medical out of Houston, Texas

Übersetzen auf: Deutsch
Bedienkomfort

 

Produktqualität

 

Kundenbetreuung

 

Bedienkomfort
Bedienkomfort
Kundenbetreuung

My best guide has been chart auditors and temporary providers that have rotated through my practice. They invariably comment on the ease of use for all functions needed in daily practice. There are functions I have not implemented.... such as scanning directly into the EMR; but has because of prior set up routines. Incentive payments have been a breeze to qualify for. Good deal for the price.

Paul J. Branche: Medizinische Praxis Anzahl der Mitarbeiter:  2-10 Mitarbeiter Mitarbeiteranzahl:  2-10 Mitarbeiter

8.6.2017

8.6.2017

Quelle der Bewertung

The worst EHR/EMR in regards to upgrades, updates, and customer service. Absolutely horrible and has cost me enormous amount of time and revenue.

Übersetzen auf: Deutsch
Bedienkomfort

 

Funktionalität

 

Produktqualität

 

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

 

Kundenbetreuung

 

Bedienkomfort
Bedienkomfort
Funktionalität
Funktionalität
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wert
Kundenbetreuung

This company seems so outdated and has been exhausting to work with. An example is the ICD 10 updates. When other colleagues stated they were ready for the deadline and conversion 6 months prior, Spring Medical was not even close to being prepared and barely at the eleventh hour, had minimal data supplied and of that data were the most unspecified codes that, to date, I am still having to performed data entry on a daily basis for specified codes for accuracy!! They have performed NO updates for coding or quality measures and ALL the work has been on our end. We are doing their job!! They are simply doing the bare minimum to qualify themselves as an EHR system and as stated earlier cost me precious time and revenue! It has become so bad that I am approaching legal counsel because this product has not worked as promised and am questioning their standard of performance despite claims in certification!

Nachteile

The updates are minimal, the support is horrible, their knowledge regarding PQRS, CQM, MIPS reporting is minimal, and the system is universally flawed. Their cost, as I have come to find out through research, is higher than some of the higher rated and successful companies.