3,8
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

3,8
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

Über athenaOne

athenahealth wurde kürzlich bei den Best in KLAS Awards 2022 für seine Anwendung athenaClinials Ambulatory EMR für 11 bis 75 Ärzte sowie sein athenaIDX-Praxismanagement ausgezeichnet. Die Anwendung bietet bietet cloudbasierte Dienste für eGA (elektronische Gesundheitsakten), Ertragszyklusmanagement und medizinische Abrechnung, Patientenbindung, Pflegekoordination und Bevölkerungsgesundheitsmanagement sowie Epocrates und andere mobile Point-of-Care-Apps. athenahealth arbeitet derzeit mit einem Netzwerk von mehr als 160.000 Gesundheitsdienstleistern zusammen. Die eGA bietet eine Homepage, mit der Nutzer den täglichen Zeitplan und die Patienteninformationen überprüfen, Bestellungen verwalten und eingehende Laborergebnisse anzeigen können. Das Abrechnungsmodul kann zusammen mit der eGA oder für sich verwendet werden und verfügt über eine patentierte und kontinuierlich aktualisierte Regel-Engine. Zu den Tools für das Management medizinischer Praxen gehören Einblicke in die täglichen Verantwortlichkeiten, individuelles Benchmarking, proaktive Trendanalyse und mehr. Patienten können über ein Patientenportal ihren Besuchsverlauf anzeigen, Rechnungen bezahlen, Formulare unterzeichnen und Termine vereinbaren. Erinnerungen können per Telefon, E-Mail oder SMS zugestellt werden und Patienten können sogar benachrichtigt werden, wenn ihre Testergebnisse im Patientenportal verfügbar sind.
athenaOne Software - 1
athenaOne Software - 2
athenaOne Software - 3
athenaOne Software - 4
athenaOne Software - 5
athenaOne Software - 6
athenaOne Video
athenaOne Software - 1 - Vorschau
athenaOne Software - 2 - Vorschau
athenaOne Software - 3 - Vorschau
athenaOne Software - 4 - Vorschau
athenaOne Software - 5 - Vorschau

athenaOne Preis

athenaOne bietet keine Gratisversion.

Startpreis:
Nicht vom Anbieter bereitgestellt
Kostenlose Version:
Nein
Kostenlose Testversion:
Nein

Alternativen für athenaOne

AdvancedMD EHR

AdvancedMD ist eine einheitliche Suite mit Softwarelösungen für Organisationen in den Bereichen psychische Gesundheit,...

Cerner Ambulatory EHR

PowerChart Ambulatory EHR von Cerner ist eine hybride eGA-Lösung (elektronische Gesundheitsakte), die sich an Klinikärzt...
EpicCare von Epic Systems ist eine ePA-Lösung (elektronische Patientenakte) für große Krankenhäuser und Gesundheitssyste...

athenaOne Erfahrungen

Funktionsbewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,5
Funktionalität
3,8
Bedienkomfort
3,8
Kundenbetreuung
3,6
Jarred
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionen
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 9.12.2018

Very easy to pick up and get going.

Vorteile

The user interface is very friendly and everything is set up to guide you through easily while entering patient information.

Nachteile

Sometimes the add on software like the label printer and document printer would stop working, but that is rare.

Colleen
  • Branche: Medizinische Praxis
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionen
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 18.10.2019

Athena review

For the most part excellent. Upgrades and updates seem to have slowed down and I think Athena has leaned more on the Market Place Vendors and less on enhancing included offers. I have made suggestions over the years and have given up as I do not feel the suggestions postings are something that Athena has been able to keep up with.

Vorteile

Claims scrubbing software. Our claims go out clean and are paid quickly. Support with MIPS. Reporting capability. Athena Text messaging. Versatility, software runs on any device. Athena text messaging. Monthly account manager calls and metrics. Partnership. Ease of creating order sets and working in clinicals. Market place partnerships are great and enhance the software and functions. Not afraid to be disruptive and things up looking for best and innovative practices.

Nachteile

Collector and Communicator insurance card copy do not communicate. Hoping one day soon you will be able to interface with EPIC. The reporting is so good that sometimes I need more support to ensure I am selecting the correct criteria.

Kristin
  • Branche: Medizinische Praxis
  • Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
1
Funktionen
1
Bedienkomfort
1
Kundenbetreuung
1

1
Bewertet am 7.6.2017

Disheartening, despite ok start, progressively worse over time (less than 6 mos) and continues

Marketed as a product for multiple disciplines and specialties, however, does not support occupational therapy services. OTs are told to use PT templates and configurations despite (1) potential conflicts with documentation for reimbursement and (2) being initially told that OTs were a supported discipline.
Account managers are not useful as they refer back to the service center for all issues. It is an endless cycle. Not knowingly, we were not set up properly before launch, and despite repeatedly telling the AM that the system wasn't sufficient for us and that we had to work harder to make it work for us, 7 months later we find that ours is not configured as it should have been. This was discovered after connecting in The community on The resource hub, which is another brush off that The managers refer clients to repeatedly, as well add o-help. There has been no response on this or even consideration of trying to keep a client happy by an account manager.
The system is severely lacking and counterintuitive, and if individuals make suggestions for improvement, they are "voted on" for consideration, even if the suggestions or requests are standard in the industry or required by governing bodies. Many requests and improvements are not made. We truly question is up to date and compliant.
Clients are told to create templates, or modify current (such as a standard facesheet), by coding them independently. Most medical practitioners (1) are not coders and (2) are not paying for a service that requires more time and effort than less. I was actually told by a higher level account manager that the solution could be to hire an outside coding agency to complete this task (vs it being standard in the existing product or have a dedicated person in Athenahealth that assists with coding needs).
The therapist reviews in the hub are not favorable. Individuals considering purchase of system would never know how many years of complaints exist and "make it work" scenarios. Unfortunately, changing EMRs is not simple and quick and is often costly. The billing portion is fair but mistakes are still made with submission requiring extra time in "hold" and delays in reimbursement. AthenaClinicals is just horrible.
There is a definite environment fostered within Athena that is brush off, dodge issues, let clients figure it out, and if they leave "oh well." We are disheartened and infuriated at the same time. If our practice had the same reviews, both public and internally, I would be very ashamed, take a step back,
and wonder where things went wrong, let alone REALLY wrong.
Bottomline: if anyone sees this who is considering Athena, regardless of discipline, go with another service provider. We as existing clients see ALOT in the community feedback on our resource hub. You will be entering something that you will then be prepared to get out of with excess cost.

Vorteile

Practice management reports and features are in abundance if that is your priority. The reminder call system does what it is supposed to. Community section in resource hub lets you know that others are just as frustrated and upset. Most of the customer service reps are very pleasant and helpful when the functionality or configuration is there; of it is sub par and missing, they do apologize.

Nachteile

The clinical documentation product is terrible. Supports physician- based practices vs rehab/OT/PT (though clients can see comments on product for all disciplines). Lack of quality templates that are compliant with regulatory agency requirements. Lack of feedback options. Lack of support. Account managers do not actually help to manage any issues you have with product. Very time consuming to call in for support repeatedly. Athenahealth clearly does not review feedback on community resource hub. Individuals that process Athenafax can be lazy and not process items with documents clearly identified with Athena identifiers/ printing, leaving in review for practice to handle (extra work). Honestly...too many cons to list.

Candice
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionen
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
4

5
Bewertet am 21.12.2023

New - Start with Athena

My overall experience is great! I have used other ehrs and I find this one to be pleasant on the eyes, intuative and informative.

Vorteile

The system is very user friendly once your set up is complete.

Nachteile

Set up is very time consuming, not very turn key.

Julie
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 14.10.2019

Bells and whistles

We are a Family Medicine Residency which makes managing the clinic more complex for us than most clinics because our providers are all part-time, there's Faculty over site of the Residents, and they are learning. We went live 2 1/2 years ago with 75 end-users and have been very successful with Athena. Implementation took about 2 1/2 months and was up to full schedules within 5 weeks of go-live. We've added on Dulcian CCM software which has helped us earn a lot of income doing CCM just documenting time we were missing in our old EHR. We've also implemented electronic check in which has helped get more historical information in our charts and more screeners completed on our patients. We realized a 1 FTE decrease in Medical Records and have realized savings in other areas.

Vorteile

There are lots of bells and whistles built into the software and they are moving towards releasing more and improving all the time. Free interfaces make life so much easier for us! Athena listens to users when developing the software, they are visionary with future software needs in order to meet MIPS requirements. Implementation was big but there were people helping us through each step. We have an amazing Account Manager and meet with him once a month to go over open issues and discuss financials. Athena is overall a very forward-thinking company. Athena Marketplace has lots of add-on features to help make your staff's lives easier. We've acclimated well.

Nachteile

The tickler system for follow up visits are subject to user errors and need constant review. However, honestly, most recall appointment tools usually do because patients just don't return on time or try to get as much time in between visits as possible. Task assignment over rides (TAO) take some getting used to and are hard to filter for some incoming document situations. I wish there were more filters on the TAOs. Our patients feel like we over-communicate with them so if you go with Athena, make sure you start asking the patients their communication preferences from the first new appointment they schedule with you. It's important to get phone calls unchecked if they do not want reminders in several ways for the same thing. Call campaigns to get patients back in for visits are embellished with their wording and can contradict what you said in your message. ie: You do not need an appointment to get your labs drawn. Then Athena adds You are due for an appointment in the email and you don't even know they are saying that to patients so something to watch. All software has things we wish were different.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

EpicCare

Warum athenaOne gewählt wurde

The technology was not keeping up especially in the electronic exchange of records area and making sure we'd have all the tools we needed to meet MIPs.

Gründe für den Wechsel zu athenaOne

More freedom to do what we wanted with the product. We're a clinic and Epic was more of a software to use for a hospital system.

Ähnliche Kategorien